|
Reviews of surgical results spotted a trend towards the value of bone
grafting (attempt to fuse) in addition to decompression. (ref #7, ref#8)
The failure to fuse in the presence of bone grafting did not initially
seem to matter. (ref#5, ref#8) Further reviews have emphasized the value
of additional instrumentation and most recently, the difference between
a solid fusion and failure to fuse was linked to better results. (ref
#1, ref#2, ref#6)
Other authors have tried more minimal surgical intervention with reasonable
short-term results. (ref# 3)
Complications
The complications of lumbar decompression and stabilization for degenerative
spondylolisthesis depend on the magnitude of the procedures used. The
standard risks are death, paralysis, infection, failure to improve, nerve
root injury, spinal fluid leak, future instability, etc. Stabilization
involves bone grafting with or without instrumentation and includes the
complications of grafting and hardware failure.
Authors Comment
Surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis involves lumbar decompression
and stabilization. The literature has historically supported decompression
only and various progressions of stabilization (bone grafting only, bone
grafting with instrumentation). The general trend is to combine decompression
with stabilization but individual clinical decisions may lead to the choice
of any of the surgical options.
References
1. Bassewitz, H. and H. Herkowitz, Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis:
current concepts of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop, 2001(384): p. 54-60.
2. Booth, K.C., et al., Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis
treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine, 1999.
24(16): p. 1721-7.
3. McCulloch, J.A., Microdecompression and uninstrumented single-level
fusion for spinal canal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Spine, 1998. 23(20): p. 2243-52.
4. Cinotti, G., et al., Predisposing factors in degenerative spondylolisthesis.
A radiographic and CT study. Int Orthop, 1997. 21(5): p. 337-42.
5. Fischgrund, J.S., et al., 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies.
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective,
randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with
and without spinal instrumentation. Spine, 1997. 22(24): p. 2807-12.
6. Bridwell, K.H., et al., The role of fusion and instrumentation in the
treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal
Disord, 1993. 6(6): p. 461-72.
7. Caputy, A.L., A., Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for
degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg, 1992. 77: p. 669-676.
8. Herkowitz, H.K., L., Degenerative lumbar sponylolisthesis with spinal
stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression
and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J.B.J.S. (Am), 1991. 73: p. 802-808.
9. Matsunaga, S., et al., Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. Spine, 1990. 15(11):
p. 1204-10.
|